Introduction
Cycles are essentially chains of events produced by continuous,
similar causes, patterns, and consequences. When one runs out, the
other often begins. Cycles occur everywhere, such as in nature and
human behavior. They are self-evident for many, but fewer really
understand them. The cycles that occur in nature are familiar to
everyone, but fewer investors understand the cycles of the economy,
financial markets and companies that are more important to them. The
cyclicality of the latter occurs, for example, in their performance,
life cycle and regulation.
Economic cycles are more than just numbers. Understanding them
requires an understanding of several factors, such as the interaction
between different causal relationships, types of people and
generations, and an understanding of the social epidemics. Partial
misunderstanding of economic cycles is essential to their existence.
So many economists as well as ordinary people miss their effect on
them.
Short introduction of the anatomy of
the cycles
The main features of the economic cycles are not significantly
different. No cycle is similar in duration, but they resemble each
other. In other words, current cycles do not repeat the past, but
they are not fundamentally different from it. Their duration,
timings, causes, and details vary, but they are similar. One major
similarity in the vast majority of economic cycles is that their
stages take place in the same order and those are almost the same in
each. Stages are not always measurable or easily detected.
I
divide the measured economic cycles roughly into ascent, peak,
descent and bottom. Some people divide the different stages into
smaller parts. Sometimes I talk about recession instead of the bottom
and top instead of the peak. Peaks and bottoms are the most
significant. Understanding of their possible existence gives
investors higher odds of better returns and to avoid losses. They are
better suited to do the latter. Perceiving the closeness of tops and
bottoms is important. Of the other stages, the investor needs to care
less excluding the separation of directions. Peaks and bottoms cannot
be predicted in advance. Their probabilities at some time intervals,
on the other hand, can be perceived.
Long economic cycles are mostly ascending. In national economies,
financial markets and companies, the main trend is upwards. They have
an average growth rate that is almost constant over the long term. At
shorter intervals, the pace fluctuates significantly both up and
down. Some cycles fluctuate on both sides of the average growth rate.
For example, the average growth of the S & P500 index has been
around 7% between 1960 and 2020, but the average annual growth rate
has been 4-10% only six times. The largest single annual increase has
been 34.1% and the annual decrease has been 38.5%. Large deviations
from the average are not uncommon.
Cycles are continuous, consist of several shorter cycles, and
intertwine. The former affects the following and so on. Ends of the
cycles should be seen as new beginnings, although they can do
significant damage. For example, the position of the United States as
a leading economic country began with the end of England. The closer
the cycles are to each other, the more they have an effect on each
other. Cycles include shorter internal cycles. For example, a long
debt cycle consists of several short debt cycles. The cycles also
intertwine. For example, long debt cycles are intertwined with long
socioeconomic cycles.
We are living in interesting times for
long-term cycles, such as the world leader cycle, the long debt cycle
and the sociological cycle. The latter apply at least to the West and
the former to all. They integrate into one large unity, which does
not directly affect everyone. In a few years, they happen as much as
in other moments of the cycles combined. For adults, these are unique
events. The above cycles affect every investor, but they have the
biggest impact on index investors.
Misunderstandings
Misunderstanding of economic cycles destroys the economies of
investors, businesses, and economies. In addition, minor losses, such
as significant capital losses, follow. The extremes and peaks of long
cycles arise from excesses. They are the result of excessive
enthusiasm and panic. They are the sum of many factors. Few realize
that they are exaggerating the extremes of the cycles.
There are three types of people: those who cannot count and those
who can. There are three types of people when it comes to economic
cycles: Those who understand that they do not exactly understand the
cycles and do not try to benefit from the extremes, those who believe
that they do not accurately understand them, but believe that they
can benefit from the extremes and those who do not understand the
cycles. Most of the latter two groups are likely to end up suffering
more from the cycles than benefiting from them. Because the extremes
of cycles are often farther than anyone believes so many will benefit
from them for a long time, but will end up suffering even more.
The worst thing about them is that the worst cycles are not
understood by mainstream economists. These individuals, who believe
in neoclassical economics and their models, think that price changes
are inherently stable, random, and small, although empirical evidence
does not support the assumptions. According to the economic models
they use, there will be no severe recessions or financial crises.
According to their models, the negative effects are so short-lived
and small that they do not need to be taken into account. Central
bankers have the most power. Their misunderstandings are best
reflected in the fact that they believe the market economy is the
best price setter, but they still control the price of money. It’s
the same thing as believing other cars will be destroyed in a severe
collision, but believing the same doesn’t apply to your own car.
They believe they can manage and predict economic cycles because
their models mostly work well. In reality, models do more harm when
they are wrong than they do good when they are right. The reason can
be found in incorrect assumptions such as too small price
fluctuations. In particular, financial market volatility is mostly
small, but the effects are non-linear. In other words, small
fluctuations are the most common, but the total changes caused by
rare large price movements are the most significant. The same goes
for economic cycles.
There are many common myths about cycles. One form of myth is
their fixed duration. There is always evidence for any length of the
cycle when you want to find it. People often look for evidence
elsewhere if it is not present in the primary target. If the stock
market does not crash in a steady cycle, then evidence is sought
elsewhere, such as in bonds, etc. By believing in myths, even money
that should not be lost can go. Duration can often be similar, but
they are not always the same.
The duration of cycles that are significant for investors range from short to centuries. Everyone needs to understand the cycles that are important to them and their lengths. For example, an investor in a country-specific index fund must realize that the lengths of important cycles are years, decades, or centuries. Lengths are not only related to investment targets but to a person’s psychological characteristics. Not everyone can manage long-term investments. They can do better when they focus on short cycles. The book mostly focuses on cycles that last for years because I myself have focused on them.
About the content
The main parts of the content are the deeper anatomy of the
cycles, the cycles related to the national economies, the cycles
related to the financial markets and the life cycles of companies. It
also addresses the intersection of three important economic cycles
and the real estate and commodity cycles. The deeper anatomy of the
cycles deals with their psychological profile as well as the factors
that shape extremes. National economic cycles include e.g. the cycle
of economic development and the cycle of a leading economic country.
Financial market cycles include e.g. long debt cycles and stock
market cycles. Life cycles related to companies include e.g.
technology adoption cycle and industry life cycle. Real estate and
commodity cycles have been treated only superficially due to the
author’s lack of understanding.
In addition, it explains how an investor can identify the
conditions of booms and bubbles prior to collapses. Efforts have been
made to present cycles by multiplying their course by
cause-and-effect relationships, mostly without numbers. More
important than numbers is to understand the course of the cycles and
the factors that interact to drive the cycles consistently. The book
has focused at least on medium cycles. In perceiving them, numbers
can be more misleading if cause-and-effect relationships or the
course of cycles are not properly understood.
In today’s world, everything affects everything, so the cycles
in the book are more or less related. In particular, the cycles of
the national economies and the financial markets are often highly
interdependent. Business cycles are also dependent on national
economies and financial markets. The latter do not decide the fate of
individual companies. It can be said that some companies are not
affected.
The book deals with the anatomy of cycles and the following cycles
and life cycles:
Long psychological / socioeconomic cycle
Economic development cycle
Leading economy cycle
Reserve currency cycle
Long and short debt cycles
Stock market cycles
Technology life cycle
Industry life cycle
Business life cycle
Real estate cycle
The main purpose of the book is to improve the reader’s chances
of increasing investment returns by better understanding the cycles
related to economics and investments. Improving revenue is most
likely to happen by reducing the number of stupid decisions made by
readers than by providing magical insights. Warren Buffett and
Charlie Munger have often mentioned that they are not particularly
wise, but avoid stupidity better than others. This makes sense for
the sake of mathematical facts alone. As most people know, a 50%
decrease requires a 100% increase, and so on.
The focus is on the extremes and extremes of the cycles, i.e. mainly bubbles, peaks, bottoms, possible crashes, beginnings, and endings. Other parts are less important. One reason for emphasizing the extremes is that, in my view, many long-term cycles are at or near the end or just past them. The ends and the beginnings refer to those cycles without peaks and bottoms. This is the case, for example, with a long psychological / socioeconomic cycle. Extremes are also the moments when the biggest differences are made in investment returns.
In my experience, the book’s publishing platform doesn’t
produce clear graphs, so I’ve left them out. I have reduced the
time and effort of the reader by keeping the book short. The book is
supposed to follow the principle: “the price is what you pay and
the value is what you get” In my experience, the number of pages
does not match the benefits of non-fiction books.
The book is not for novice investors. It does not explain
everything in detail. The reader needs to know what the basic
concepts like P / E ratio, Return on Equity and Earnings per share mean. A broader
understanding of the economy is desirable but not essential. An open
mind is also important because the book calls into question many
things that at least economists consider true. Independent thinking
is also essential. No book offers absolute truth about the economy
because it cannot be found. The world is too complex for today’s
computing power. This book does not offer it either, as the author
knows his limitations.
The book contains a few investment ideas. If they are found, they are vague in the style of "substances used for intoxication can be a good investment in Awakening." (An explanation of the former can be found later.) The book does not contain exact predictions of what is to come, but it gives a broad explanation of what may happen or what is the most likely option for the future. It does not predict when anything will happen.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti